Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 5:38 p.m.
Andrew Pielage / New Times
Recreational marijuana might face “greater enforcement” by federal authorities, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said on Thursday.
Spicer’s statements at a White House news conference seemed to foreshadow a crackdown on state-legal marijuana operations, while drawing a distinction between medicinal- and adult-use programs.
The legal-marijuana industry has been holding its breath since Trump’s election, waiting to find out how the new president would approach the controversial subject.
The state’s voters rejected a recreational marijuana proposal in November even as voters in California, Maine, Massachusetts, and Nevada approved legalizing marijuana for all adults 21 and older.
Roby Brock of Talk Business and Politics in Arkansas asked the question today on the mind’s of many: What will Trump and Sessions do?
Spicer began by drawing a sharp distinction between recreational and medical marijuana.
“When you see something like the opioid addiction crisis blossoming in so states around this country, the last thing we should be doing is encouraging people.”
He added that “there is still a federal law that we need to abide by… when it comes to… recreational marijuana and other drugs of that nature.”
Spicer then went on to explain that regulated medical-marijuana was okay. He referred to legislation that prevented the Justice Department from using funds to target medical-marijuana businesses.
Recreational, he said — “that’s a very, very different subject.”
After a follow-up question, he said, “I do believe that you’ll see greater enforcement of it,” and again talked about the “distinction” between medical and recreational use.
“Sounds like the president is going to respect the will of our voters our states rights and the fantastic medical marijuana system that we have in place!” Downing wrote in an email. The association represents a number of the state’s 100-plus medical-marijuana dispensaries.
Downing warned that, “I am not sure what this means for states like California and Colorado.”
The national Marijuana Policy Project released a statement about Spicer’s comments, noting that enforcement action would run against the wishes of state voters.
A survey released earlier today by Quinnipiac University found strong opposition to federal action against state-legal marijuana operations, the MPP’s statement pointed out.
“This administration is claiming that it values states’ rights, so we hope they will respect the rights of states to determine their own marijuana policies,” said Mason Tvert, MPP spokesman. “It is hard to imagine why anyone would want marijuana to be produced and sold by cartels and criminals rather than tightly regulated, taxpaying businesses.”
It was “critical,” he said, that Congress continue to exclude medical-marijuana from enforcement, “and we are hopeful that they will also adopt a provision that extends that principle to all state marijuana laws.”